| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200412151458.iBFEwIsB021889@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: TCP Port 42 port scans? What the heck over... On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:33:42 EST, Matt Ostiguy said: > found an exploitable bug in the WINS service. Still, given how few > people one would expect to have that port accessible through a > firewall, or just how low the percentage of windows servers running > WINS is Do you have any actual data showing that either of those two numbers is low, or are you relying on "if people have clue, these will be low"? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041215/e7e686df/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists