[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9E97F0997FB84D42B221B9FB203EFA275CBB90@dc1ms2.msad.brookshires.net>
From: toddtowles at brookshires.com (Todd Towles)
Subject: Shoe 1.0 - Remote Lace Overflow
Very funny, nice work.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf
> Of announce@...0.org
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 10:21 AM
> To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com; dailydave@...unitysec.com;
> full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Shoe 1.0 - Remote Lace Overflow
>
> Shoe 1.0 - Remote Lace Overflow
> --------------------------------------------
>
> This Vulnerability is in reference to the new class of
> remote vulnerabilities indicated in:
> http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/385078/2004-12-19/2004-12-25/2
> [Please read that first]
>
> Discovery Credited To:
> ----------------------
> freshman - 0x90.org
> wxs - 0x90.org
> txs - 0x90.org
>
> Greets:
> -------
> Jonathan T. Rockway for being the smartest man alive.
>
> Description:
> ------------
> A remote shoe vulnerability exists that could allow for
> remote tripping and possible exposure of sensitive data to
> the pavement.
>
> Scope:
> ------
> REMOTE
>
> Severity:
> ---------
> Hyper-Critical. This needs no explanation.
>
> Vulnerability:
> --------------
> Failure to properly tie your shoe could result in tripping
> and a possible broken face upon sudden deceleration when
> hitting the pavement.
>
> Vulnerable Sizes:
> -----------------
> 6 through 13. Other sizes may be vulnerable, but were
> unavailable for testing.
>
> Exploitation:
> -------------
> You have a 100% secure walking system - you do not fall
> down, or trip over your own laces. A remote attacker could
> determine your shoe size by reading your livejournal FROM
> THE NETWORK and could MAIL YOU a shoe with extra long laces.
> You put the shoe on without tying it properly and suddenly
> are exposed to a REMOTE shoe vulnerability!
>
> Fix:
> ----
> Do not wear untrusted shoes sent to you. Other possible
> workarounds include sandals (aka. flip-flops). These are a
> good work-around and are widely available for those
> concerned about their security.
>
> Vendor Notification:
> --------------------
> Vendors were not notified at the time of this writing. We
> have choosen not to give advance notice because the fault is
> not always with the vendor of the shoe as a REMOTE PERSON
> could SNAIL MAIL a LOCAL USER a vulnerable shoe.
>
> We at 0x90.org believe that the users should be happy they
> were notified about this. Imagine the mass destruction and
> chaos that would ensue if we unleashed a REMOTE SHOE
> VULNERABILITY WORM into the wild. At this time we have
> choosen not to do that, mostly because we can not afford all
> the stamps to mail vulnerable shoes to the public.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists