full-disclosure - Multiple Backdoors found in eEye Products (IRIS and SecureIIS)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: dave at immunitysec.com (Dave Aitel)
Subject: Multiple Backdoors found in eEye Products	(IRIS
	and SecureIIS)

Daniel H. Renner wrote:

>I recall an interview with a highly placed security executive back in
>the later '90s.  In this interview he lamented being in the security
>business in the United States with a line similar to:
>
>"If you create and announce a security product in the United States, you
>will very shortly have the NSA entering your premises and demanding 'Ok,
>where is our backdoor?'"
>
>And remember, eEye was started after one of it's co-founders woke up to
>federal guns pointed at his head one fine morning, having been mistaken
>as someone who had penetrated somewhere he shouldn't have.
>
>Not to bash my own country here but, this leads to a question: How can
>any security product, sub-product or service created in the U.S. hold
>credibility even with the good intentions that the creators may have
>originally had?
>  
>

It's an interesting question, and Immunity answers it in this email we 
sent to DailyDave a while back.

http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/dailydave/2004-q3/0206.html

Dave Aitel
Immunity, Inc.