lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <41DD1D02.70207@sbcglobal.net> From: stevex11 at sbcglobal.net (Steve Kudlak) Subject: list noise In my case I get a mix of stuff that comes a variety of places. The various sbc clones were in there, so was symoatico. There were Healtyh Insurance processors and they seemed the worst. I think it varies depending on a lot of variables. But it is worth watching this stuff and taking adequate precautions. I have Norton and am considering a backup. My other account is run through sentinare which is really good that plus Norton gets almost everything. The only one that got through yearsn ago was the A"Playa Virus" but luckily I don't use IE or Outlook and I just tossed it withoug opening the attachment so all was OK. Have Fun, Sends Steve P,S, I also scan all outgoing mail etc. dcdave@....net wrote: > Steve, > > On a related topic, what is sbcglobal? > 90% of the virus e-mail I see coming in where I work (usually Jennifer > the wild girl xxx07) is coming from infected sbcglobal addresses. > > Warm regards, > dcdave-- > CSO > InfoSec Group > 703-626-6516 > > -------------- Original message from Steve Kudlak > <stevex11@...global.net>: -------------- > > > > dcdave@....net wrote: > > > > >I will NOT respond to this; > > >I will NOT respond to this; > > >I will Not respond to this; > > > > > >dcdave > > > > > >-- > > >CSO > > >InfoSec Group > > >703-626-6516 > > > > > > > > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > > >From: phased > > > > > > > > >>I also care about noise, and responding to stupid mails makes > it worse. > > >>Every time people send stupid mails like the rm file thing, > and people reply > > to > > >>the list, the author was successful in filling the list with > crap for a day or > > >>so. > > >> > > >>If no one replies, then they dont get attention and the people > who know their > > >>advisories(anyone with common sense) are blatantly crap will > not be affected > > by > > >>their nuisance. > > >> > > >>You always get a load of emails to the list from people who > want to tell > > >>everyone they know that an advisory for example was crap, yes > we know > > >>thank you, but we are not handing out gold stars today!!! > > >>No need to tell us all every time!!! > > >> > > >>phased > > >> > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: Barrie Dempster > > >>To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > > >>Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 09:36:07 +0000 > > >>Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Multiple Backdoors found in eEye > > Products(IRISand > > >>SecureIIS) > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>I'd hav! e to agr ee with the eEye statement on this one. You > sent out an > > >>>advisory without disclosing the details, which offers no real > benefit to > > >>>anyone. Many people consider this responsible disclosure but > that also > > >>>requires you to notify the vendor (there were no @eeye.com's > in your > > >>>"to" list but there were a couple of press mailboxes). > > >>> > > >>>You didn't contact eEye, you didn't release details, you used an > > >>>anonymous address and failed to mention or credit any of the > other guys > > >>>in your "testing team", This can only lead us to believe that > the > > >>>advisory is fake and only intended to generate bad press for > eEye. I > > >>>personally don't care about eEye's PR rating but I do care > about the > > >>>level of noise on these lists and I do care about backdoor-ed > commercial > > >>>products that are in common use. You may have an issue with > eEye and see > > >>>this as revenge. However, I doubt you also have an issue with > the many > > >>>admins who probably have spent their holiday season > investigating these > > >>>claims, when there are likely more pressing matters to > address, such as > > >>>a large stock of alcohol. > > >>> > > >>>Show us details, or be quiet. If you intended to embarrass > eEye the plan > > >>>backfired as any competent professional on this list (there > are a few - > > >>>I've heard stories about them) would see this as a shameful > attempt and > > >>>would be laughing at you, not eEye. > > >>> > > >>>Seasons greetings to eEye and all Full Disclosure subscribers > - even you > > >>>"Lance Gusto". > > >>> > > >>>With Regards.. > > >>>Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue > > >&! gt;> > > >>> http://www.bsrf.org.uk > > >>> > > >>>[ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0x96025FD0 ] > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>ATTACHMENT: application/pgp-signature ("signature.asc") > > >>> > > >>>_______________________________________________ > > >>>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > >>>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>_______________________________________________ > > >>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > >>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > > > > > > > > > Neither Will I! > > Neither Will I! > > Neither Will I! > > Let it Die! > > Let it Die! > > Let it Die!;) > > > > Have Fun, > > Sends Steve > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists