lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <crmlaa$ioj$1@sea.gmane.org> From: davek_throwaway at hotmail.com (Dave Korn) Subject: Re: ndisasm bad opcodes interpretation "shadown" <shadown@...il.com> wrote in message news:d8360fbf0501070830475ef080@...l.gmail.com... > > i.e: > 0000001C 7565 jnz 0x83 > sould had been jnz 0x65 No it shouldn't. Engage brain before opening mouth: what is 0x65 + 0x1e (== address of byte immediately after the instruction in question)? Google "pc-relative branch displacement" for more. Or learn some assembler programming before trying to use a disassembler. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
Powered by blists - more mailing lists