full-disclosure - Can we have...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d3f4951050126125442c50779@mail.gmail.com>
From: jdaytona at gmail.com (Jeremy Davis)
Subject: Can we have...

>From a fellow former mountaineer to another.
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Thunderbird_:_FAQs_:_Turn_off_HTML/MIME




On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:43:33 -0800, Steve Kudlak <stevex11@...global.net> wrote:
> Brian Anderson wrote:
> 
> > G'day,
> >
> > I enjoy reading some of the messages in the Full Disclosure list
> > however I opt to receive the list as a daily digest. This has the
> > problem (for me) that I have to scroll thru the entire email message
> > looking for the item(s) that I want to read.
> >
> > Another list I subscribe to (Mailman-Users) has the following header...
> >
> > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1525231028=="
> >
> > ... which (when using Thunderbird) nicely provides a method to jump to
> > just the item(s) that I want to read.
> >
> > I have previously messaged the List-Owner regarding adding this
> > however he suggested I ask the list so here I am.
> >
> > Do you believe that this is "good idea" and should be implemented?
> >
> > Thanks
> > BJA
> 
> For whom would it break thingss?  I used to live in Northern West
> Virginia and was caught in a very technophobic area with few technophile
> friends.  I used to like this thing called "Dimestore Productions"  but
> the guy who controlled it was in Metro Cleveland and had DSL and nice
> stuff already.. He would just implement things and it would break things
> for many people and he would just assume "Oh well they can't keep
> up..."  I gave up on them for that reason.
> 
> So is there anyone would this would break something for, or force them
> to use a Browser/Mail Handler they don't like?  Right now I read my mail
> with Thunderbird, but unless I can find the switch that let's me tweak
> the "forwarding mechanism" so it does not forward things as attachments
> which many people just won't open I will go back to plain Mozilla/Netscape.
> 
> Have Fun,
> Sends Steve
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>