full-disclosure - ICMP Covert channels question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20050129083752.D87C825C013@mail.nettracers.com>
From: lists-security at nettracers.com (lists-security@...tracers.com)
Subject: ICMP Covert channels question

Paul Schmehl Said:
>No, because non-routeable addresses are...well....non-routeable.  

But Paul, I route non-routable addresses all the time.  It is only internet
routers that are usually configured to not route certain addresses.  I go
into many nets where the router is attempting to send out 192.168's 172.'s
and 10's out the external interface.  Now they don't get far since the ISP
won't take them or just sinks them, but the routers will try to handle them.

Some routers (plenty won't) will probably try to "return" those ICMP's to
the internal interface, thus providing your covert channel.  Furthermore,
you may be able to do some interesting things with the type and code fields
to encode further information.  

- Bryan
- bwatson@...tracers.com