full-disclosure - How T-Mobil's network was compromised

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: How T-Mobil's network was compromised 

On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 01:09:29 +0200, Willem Koenings said:

> 3. testing doesn't reveal absence of unknown flaw
> 4. testing doesn't reveal absence of all unknown flaws

Think for a moment - would you *ever* be able to go to your boss and say:

"I've finished testing the program, and even though there are bugs we didn't
test for because we don't know what they are, I'm sure there's none in the
program"?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050220/258bdf39/attachment.bin