full-disclosure - Re: Incorrect Classification of iDownload's Product as Spyware...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <421CE6EB.7060106@digistruction.com>
From: davec at digistruction.com (Dave C)
Subject: Re: Incorrect Classification of iDownload's
	Product as Spyware...

I frequent and read CC often and couldn't agree more. ISearch gets it's 
hooks so far into a system that it can only be classed as the garbage 
spyware program that it is(IMHO).

Goos job and good luck!

Paul Laudanski wrote:
> In a letter received by CastleCops from a law firm representing 
> iDownload/iSearch Toolbar:
> 
> http://castlecops.com/article-5762-nested-0-0.html
> 
> It has been found out that another website has received a similar form.  
> In the next link is our response, with more information on the other 
> website, Spyware Warrior Blog:
> 
> http://castlecops.com/article-5765-nested-0-0.html
> 
> Other security sites have picked up the story:
> 
> http://netrn.net/spywareblog/archives/2005/02/22/idownloads-product-is-not-malware/
> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12733617%7Emode=flat
> http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/60608
> http://www.revenews.com/wayneporter/archives/000429.html
> http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=67648
>