full-disclosure - [lists] RE: Awake a modem with AT commands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OF9BFA81EF.30254B15-ON86256FB6.004DE1E6-86256FB6.004E57F5@kohls.com>
From: Bart.Lansing at kohls.com (Bart.Lansing@...ls.com)
Subject: [lists] RE: Awake a modem with AT commands

full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.netsys.com wrote on 02/26/2005 07:43:02 AM:

> Syed Imran Ali wrote:
> > I don't know if you specifically asked for DSL or Cable 
> > modems or what you exactly wanna do with it.
> > 
> > As far as AT commands are your concerns, I think most of the 
> > ppl on the list can help you out. 
> > 
> > Btw, elucidate ur question please.
> 
> Mr. Ali,
> 
> Please be aware that action09 does not need to "elucidate", as you 
obviously
> do not understand what she was saying to start with.  I do not mean to 
mock
> you, but you really need to get a clue.  True, my first modem was 300 
baud,
> but if you try to issue an AT command to a DSL or cable modem, I think 
you
> will not get a response.
> 
> Curt Purdy CISSP, GSEC, CNE, MCSE+I, CCDA 
> Information Security Engineer 
> DP Solutions 
> 

Curt, do you think that maybe, just maybe, that the request Ryed made of 
action09 to "elucidate" was in fact a request for clarification?  One 
often does that when one does not clearly understand what is being said. 
Maybe a little less caffeine in your diet...just a thought.

Bart