lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <422FF65C.5060904@linuxbox.org>
From: ge at linuxbox.org (Gadi Evron)
Subject: Administrivia: A new home for FD

pfuggle@...sics.unimelb.edu.au wrote:
> I shouldn't have to "fix" my settings for the damn list! I didn't break
> them! The list should have a competent admin who does not subscribe
> me to full mode when I asked for digest only! It's not only the
> unauthorised junk in my inbox that is unacceptable, it's the expectation
> that I should waste my time changing passwords, settings etc. for one
> pissant list, else get spammed.

You are absolutely right.
It is annoying to go to the web page and click on a small box. I am not 
being cynical (here).

Problem is, Mailman is annoying with such changes... so instead of 
asking why and/or just fixing yourself in 2 seconds...
I'd sue the admins. After all, this is a service you pay good money for.

	Gadi.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ