[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <422FF65C.5060904@linuxbox.org>
From: ge at linuxbox.org (Gadi Evron)
Subject: Administrivia: A new home for FD
pfuggle@...sics.unimelb.edu.au wrote:
> I shouldn't have to "fix" my settings for the damn list! I didn't break
> them! The list should have a competent admin who does not subscribe
> me to full mode when I asked for digest only! It's not only the
> unauthorised junk in my inbox that is unacceptable, it's the expectation
> that I should waste my time changing passwords, settings etc. for one
> pissant list, else get spammed.
You are absolutely right.
It is annoying to go to the web page and click on a small box. I am not
being cynical (here).
Problem is, Mailman is annoying with such changes... so instead of
asking why and/or just fixing yourself in 2 seconds...
I'd sue the admins. After all, this is a service you pay good money for.
Gadi.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists