[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42321206.5010101@umbrella.name>
From: liudieyu at umbrella.name (Liu Die Yu)
Subject: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France?
nothing would have happened to the hacker, if he had not published his
eye-catching stuff.
the corporation wanted to punish this hacker because he somehow ruined
their reputation ... and they did it successfully.
now french guys will think twice before publishing eye-catching
stuff("i'm using illegal software?", "should i hide myself?", etc) ...
such fear and sense of sin is what software vendors want.
jean-philippe Gaulier wrote:
>On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:40:46 +0100
>sec-list@...og.org wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>
>
>>in France some strange things happen:
>>http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/security/0,2000061744,39183862,00.htm
>>
>>
>
>I disagree with this article. I'm french, I know Guillaume and don't like
>Viguard, so I think that I could chat about that a little more.
>
>Guillaume was convicted not for his publication, but because he used first
>a "pseudo" illegal copy of tegam viguard, and disassemble not for compatibility
>
>The decision of the court is defined as "really friendly" for the researcher
>community.
>
>This point of view is explained by a french lawyer there :
>http://maitre.eolas.free.fr/journal/index.php?2005/03/08/87-guillermito-condamne-mais-tres-legerement
>
>
>See ya.
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
>
>.
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists