full-disclosure - Re: Multiple AV Vendor Incorrect CRC32 BypassVulnerability.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20050312023242.17864.qmail@web31512.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
From: visitbipin at yahoo.com (bipin gautam)
Subject: Re: Multiple AV Vendor Incorrect CRC32
	BypassVulnerability.

1'st issue: Could anyone verify the existance of both
vulnebrility in *Symantec products* cauz it seems like
symantec engineers got the *old* broken file that i
reported lately and couldn't reproduce the thing. I
tried reporting the issue but the message had a broken
eicarta string so i think the message wasn't deliverd!
I uploaded a wrong file before and the same old file
kept on comming from the servers cache. I was able to
transperently extract the broken CRC archive using
Download accelerator Plus(5.3) with just a warning
message.

2'nd issue: NOP, the zip file wasn't "ACTUALLY"
encrypted.  Nor, anything else in the archive was
modified! The archive can be normally be extracted by
any unzip utility. I did tested it with winrar 3.2 &
with default zip manager of winxp (sp2).

3'rd issue(NEW): Well, tested with F-prot, DrWeb,
*Symantec 8.0 long ago... lately verified it using
virustotal.com If you have a long archive coment... in
a zip archive these AV can't detect virus embedded in
it. though a frend of mine reported me symantec 8.1 is
immune to the bug.

POC:
http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/long_coment.zip

--- Randall M <randallm@...mail.com> wrote:
> I scanned the file with McAfee 8.0i and it end up
> stating that it couldn't
> scan the EICAR.COM file because it was encrypted.
> Was this your
> Intention?
> 
> ------------------------------
--- Steve Scholz <steve_scholz@...ari.com> wrote:

> You are correct by doing this you are marking the
> zip file as encrypted.
> 
> Your option at this time is to turn on the feature
> delete encrypted
> compressed files.
> 

> Steve Scholz
> Corporate Sales Engineer-North America
> Sybari Software, Inc.
> 631-630-8556 Direct
> 516-903-2464 Mobile
> 
> Email:  Steve_scholz@...ari.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: Multiple AV Vendor
> Incorrect CRC32
> BypassVulnerability.
> 
> In Local file header if you modify "general purpose
> bit flag" 7th & 8'th byte of a zip archive with \x2f
> ie: "\" F-port, Kaspersky, Mcafee, Norman, Sybari,
> Symantec seem to skip the file marking it as
> clean!!!
> This was discoverd during the analysis of "Multiple
> AV
> Vendor Incorrect CRC32 Bypass Vulnerability."
> 
> Quick/rough conclusion were drawn using
> www.virustotal.com
> 
> poc: http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/gpbf.zip
> 
> regards,
> bipin gautam

__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/