full-disclosure - Fwd: NDA & SOX?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6.0.1.1.2.20050312183850.053c6210@mail.mindtheater.net>
From: nekramer at mindtheater.net (Nancy Kramer)
Subject: Fwd: NDA & SOX?

I think in that situation you should consult a competent attorney and make 
sure you have some money in the bank to support you for awhile and pay the 
attorney's fees.

The people on this list are supposed to know about computer security not 
business liability law which is what this email pertains too.  Most of the 
people on this list are probably as bad at being attorneys as attorneys 
would be at being security consultants.  I did desktop support for 
attorneys for awhile and believe be most are not "good" with computers even 
real smart ones who graduated from Harvard and Stanford which some of my 
users had done.

Regards,

Nancy Kramer

At 03:01 PM 3/11/2005, Jason Coombs wrote:
>The flaws harm investors, they harm the public, they harm information 
>security in general. They are unethical. You inform the company that the 
>flaws exist, and nothing is done about them. Instead, you're slowly but 
>forcefully pushed out of the company.
>
>You've signed an NDA.
>
>What do you do?

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.2 - Release Date: 3/11/2005