[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42333317.7050400@psilanthropy.org>
From: hades at psilanthropy.org (Anders Langworthy)
Subject: Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to Uncle
Sam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a good idea
any more...
J.A. Terranson wrote:
> This "story" really just reflects what has been going on in the real world
> for some time now.
Yes. Another incident from two years ago that demonstrates this
philosophy quite well:
[From http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,921855,00.asp]
[FEDS MOVE TO SECURE NET]
"The most significant move is the development of a private,
compartmentalized network that will be used by federal agencies and
private-sector experts to share information during large-scale security
events...
"Sachs...pointed to last week's handling of the critical vulnerability
in the Sendmail Mail Transfer Agent package as a prime example of how
such back-channel communication between vendors, researchers and the
government can help protect end users. Researchers at Internet Security
Systems Inc., in Atlanta, discovered the vulnerability in mid-February
and immediately notified officials at the White House and the Department
of Homeland Security.
The government quietly spread the word among federal agencies and, along
with ISS, began contacting the affected vendors. After the vendors
developed patches, the fixes were deployed quickly on critical
government, military and private-sector machines before the official
announcement of the vulnerability."
Powered by blists - more mailing lists