[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20050312075740.11308.qmail@web31503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
From: visitbipin at yahoo.com (bipin gautam)
Subject: Re: Multiple AV Vendor Incorrect
CRC32BypassVulnerability.
> While it might be a vulnerability if the file is
> extracted which it hasto be to be executed the
> desktop scanner will detect it at that time.
> Multiple layers of defense is your best option
> As far as number 3 Antigen detects Eicar.
YAP, i never reported Antigen vulnerable to the 3'rd
one.
Though, In Local file header if you modify "general
purpose bit flag" 7th & 8'th byte of a zip archive
with \x2f Antigen is also seem to be vulnerable! While
most unzip utilities are transperently able to extract
SUCH* archive without any problem! Though,currently my
only source of verifying this is via
www.virustotal.com and some others. [Go, TRY IT
THEER!]
http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/gpbf.zip
> I can see if there is anything
> else that you do not
> think Antigen is doing correctly.
(O;
For instant,
In the 'local file header" & "data descriptor" if you
change the compressed size and uncompressed size to
ZERO[iDEFENSE] or greater than the actual file size or
less than the actual file size still there are many AV
that can't scan the file properly.
http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/Antigen_b.zip
http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/Antigen_s.zip
Moreover there are unzip utilities that goes to a loop
if the filesize is changed to ffffffff ! Lets hope, AV
don't have such faulty code!
Just run the file through www.virustotal.com and
you'll see. (I know, they aren't using up-to-date scan
engine)
Thanks,
bipin
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists