lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: steve_scholz at sybari.com (Steve Scholz)
Subject: Multiple
	AVVendorIncorrectCRC32BypassVulnerability.

?
Hi Bipin,
Well just by definition of what eicar is all you did was corrupt a file and made it not useable. I am sure that any other executable would do the same. Try it with a real virus I am sure there will be enough code for the AV scanners to detect. Since eicar is just a test string for testing reasons only it needs to be on the first line and only the eicar string can be in the document for it to be eicar. I still fail to see that you proved anything.
-Steve

________________________________

From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk on behalf of bipin gautam
Sent: Sun 3/13/2005 12:53 AM
To: bipin gautam; Steve Scholz
Cc: vuln@...unia.com; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Re: [Private]Multiple AVVendorIncorrectCRC32BypassVulnerability.



--- Steve Scholz <steve_scholz@...ari.com> wrote:
> Hi Bipin,
> By design Eicar needs to be the exact string and on
> the first line with nothing else following it. So
> the file is not actually an Eicar I get this with
> advanced zip repair. So now we won't detect this
> because it is not Eicar.
>
>
X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*PK...
>
>      ./??"F?-?sp  ?sp          .         eicar.comPK..
>    . . 7   k 

"not Eicar" so???     (O; It exactly did what it was
intended to! TRY IT WITH OTHER EXECUDABLES THEN.

In the 'local file header" & "data descriptor" if you
change the compressed size and uncompressed size to
greater than the actual file size there are many AV
that can't scan the file properly.
Most, unzip utilities will successfully extract such
archive with some garbage data \x00 at the end "255
bytes. (SO DOES THE AV ENGINE)  The garbage data
doesn't *that matter because any malicious code can
"execute without any problem" with still the garbage
at its end. "This will successfully bypass AV
detection even for a known malicious code!"  "MOST OF
THE TIME" if the AV detects the executable comparing
its total checksum!

(but for effectiveness, FORGE  the crc, first for real
effectiveness)



regards,
bipin gautam
get the updates in this issue at:
http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/

secunia.com;
> full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk;
> bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
> Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: [Private]Multiple AV
> VendorIncorrectCRC32BypassVulnerability.
>
> Steve,
> firstly... thankyou for all your coments.
>
> > The Antigen_s.zip does not contain a valid Eicar
> > this info when repaired
> > and opened is X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX
> > We did catch it with a file filter.
> > What was your intent with these files?
>
> OOPS! again my fault!!!
> TRY: http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/Antigen.zip
>
> my intension was to show, if the archive has
> compressed size and uncompressed size set to greater
> than the actual file size or less than the actual
> file
> size there are many AV that can't scan the file
> properly.
>
> send
> http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/Antigen.zip
>  to virustotal.com and see for yourself!!!
>
> Download Accelerator successfully repairs this
> archive
> with some garbage data \x00 at the end "255 bytes"
> Though, i was able to successfully execute eicar.com
>
> -bipin
> updates at:
> http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/crc.html
> ___________________My report!_______________________
> This is a report processed by VirusTotal on
> 03/12/2005
> at 18:38:32 (CET) after scanning the file
> "Antigen.zip" file.
> 
> Antivirus     Version Update  Result    
> AntiVir       6.30.0.5 03.11.2005     Eicar-Test-Signature      
> AVG   718     03.11.2005      EICAR_Test (+187)         
> BitDefender 7.0       03.12.2005      no virus found    
> ClamAV        devel-20050307  03.10.2005
> Eicar-Test-Signature 
>  
> DrWeb 4.32b   03.12.2005 no virus found         
> eTrust-Iris 7.1.194.0 03.12.2005 no virus found         
> eTrust-Vet 11.7.0.0 03.11.2005 no virus found   
> Fortinet 2.51 03.11.2005      no virus found    
> F-Prot        3.16a   03.11.2005      EICAR_Test_File   
> Ikarus        2.32    03.11.2005      EICAR-ANTIVIRUS-TESTFILE          
> Kaspersky     4.0.2.24        03.12.2005      EICAR-Test-File   
> McAfee        4445    03.11.2005      no virus found    
> NOD32v2       1.1024  03.11.2005      archive damaged   
> Norman        5.70.10 03.10.2005      no virus found    
> Panda 8.02.00 03.12.2005      Eicar.Mod         
> Sybari        7.5.1314 03.12.2005     no virus found    
> Symantec 8.0  03.11.2005      no virus found  


               
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050313/1a6a0abe/attachment.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ