[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200503141945.j2EJjWjG023328@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Re: Know Your Enemy: Tracking Botnets
(ThorstenHolz)
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:01:39 +0300, Egoist said:
> Lot of systems? Where you get that statistic ? How do u analyze that?
> Antivirus software catched agobot on some computer and you just increment counters?
Right. I find an agobot, I increment a counter.
If the counter ends up at '3', agobot hasn't hit many systems.
If the counter ends up at '3,000,000', agobot has hit a lot of systems.
Are you seriously trying to convince us that agobot *didn't* infect a lot of
systems? I suppose that next, you're going to try to convince us that the lame
code in Nimda and Nachi didn't hit many systems either, because of its lameness....
I never claimed there weren't bots that weren't being detected - what I said was
that the lamely-coded bots have still managed to nail a lot of systems.
And just because my car has a slow oil leak that I haven't been able to track down
the exact cause is no reason to not change the brake pads when they start squealing.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050314/a9ab3d4f/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists