[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200503140429.j2E4T7wL031056@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Re: iDownload/iSearch responds to Spyware
Critics
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:41:22 GMT, King Fuddler said:
> I agree totally. What's even more interesting is that Apple Computers
> hasn't gotten itself involved - a company getting this much exposure
> with this degree of copyright infringement in its product name is
> surely going to catch Jobs' eye sooner or later.
A minor correction - if Apple goes after them for the use of 'iFoo',
that would be a trademark issue (governed by Title 35 of the US Code), rather than
a copyright issue (governed by Title 17). The paperwork for trademarks
is handed by the Patent and Trademark Office, the paperwork for registering
copyrights is done with the Register of Copyrights over at the Library of Congress.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050313/0385be90/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists