full-disclosure - CISSP Test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <42404229.80707@gmail.com>
From: wireless.insecurity at gmail.com (Vladamir)
Subject: CISSP Test

Wow, thanks a lot. I'll pick the book back up, I have read about a lot 
of "clueless" CISSPs, this one gentlemen I spoke with (Who is a CISSP) 
said that OpenBSD is easily remotely exploitable, it made me question 
the integrity of this gentleman and the process in which one becomes a 
CISSP (Assuming it has to do with through understanding of secure 
networks, platforms, etc)

What are some of the other Computer/Network security exams that are good 
for showing a through understanding of the concepts?

Wade Woolwine wrote:
> Agreed with Robert on this one. It's pretty much a sure-fire way to get
> your foot in the door...esp. if you're dealing with Gov. contractors or
> the Gov. itself. Once you have the job, if you don't have the skills, you
> won't last long. I figure 90% of the job battle is actually getting
> through the HR folks who look over resumes checking off boxes in a
> checklist to see if you qualify - certs/education and of course experience
> will fill all those check lists.
> 
> wade
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>