full-disclosure - windows linux final study

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0503292041100.22399-100000@tundra.winternet.com>
Date: Wed Mar 30 03:44:13 2005
From: dufresne at winternet.com (Ron DuFresne)
Subject: windows linux final study

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Lachniet, Mark wrote:

> Curmudgeon,
>
> Yes, but did you actually verify their research using their methodology
> to see if they screwed up?
>

		[SNIP]

But, if the conclusions are patently false, to say the least, does it
matter if the underlying methodology has any tendency to soundness?  <or
does it actually highlight that the methodology was as bogus as the
conclusions?>

Thanks,

Ron DuFresne
-- 
"Sometimes you get the blues because your baby leaves you. Sometimes you get'em
'cause she comes back." --B.B. King
        ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***

OK, so you're a Ph.D.  Just don't touch anything.