full-disclosure - PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200505092009.j49K91Ww026473@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Mon May  9 21:09:10 2005
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older
	versions or something (maybe later too) 

On Mon, 09 May 2005 11:59:16 PDT, Day Jay said:
> It was figured out long ago pal, the fact of the
> matter is and that I pointed out numbskull is that he
> should automate getting of the stack pointer like all
> of the other one's do.  

Except the code you were penis-extender-waving around as
an example of how you have to steal lame exploits you can't
even fix.

Figure out how to get that 1700 automated in *your* code, and then
we'll talk.

(I'd not get on your case about it, except that the code you
posted has *more* hardcoding in it than the code you're complaining
about).

>                         It's a default value hardcoded
> in..let it go.

So now you're admitting it's a default value, not a hardcoded one?
Whatever happened to standing up for your position? (And you're still
missing the point - if it's a changeable value with a default, it's not
hardcoded).

> You and your gay lover can continue looking at kiddie
> porn now.

When all else fails, resort to ad hominem attacks.  You know, with
a bad attitude like that, it's not surprising that you can't get
access to any better exploits to steal.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050509/acda8df3/attachment.bin