[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <052301c554f1$5847d000$0e3eac18@MLANDE>
Date: Tue May 10 00:44:45 2005
From: mlande at bellsouth.net (Mary Landesman)
Subject: Firefox Remote Compromise Leaked
Well, that's one way to crunch the numbers.
Of course, IE 6 has been out since 2001, Firefox 1.x was released three
years later. Looking at the advisories on a timeframe basis for 2005,
Firefox 1.x has had 12 Secunia advisories compared to 6 for IE 6. In other
words, the odds you're banking on shift quite a bit depending on how you
look at it.
-- Mary
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Paynter" <eric@...ticbears.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox Remote Compromise Leaked
On Sun, May 8, 2005 7:49 am, Bipin Gautam said:
> Looking at the current record, what makes you guys think firefox won't
> beat IE 6 for security holes. (o;
According to secunia.com:
IE 6.x has had 80 advisories, of which 42% (34 advisories) were rated
highly or extremely critical, and 3 critical advisories are still
unpatched after several months.
Firefox 1.x has had 16 advisories, of which 19% (3 advisories) were rated
highly or extremely critical, and only 1 critical advisory is still
unpatched, but it's only been in that state for a few days, and a patch is
on its way.
Soon, we will once again have no unpatched critical vulnerabilities with
Firefox, and we will still have three or more with IE.
I still like my odds with Firefox.
-Eric
--
arctic bears - email and dns services
http://www.arcticbears.com
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists