full-disclosure - Fwd: GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e92364c3050509183263582f99@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue May 10 02:32:47 2005
From: jftucker at gmail.com (James Tucker)
Subject: Fwd: GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)

Surely this kind of message is a really bad idea.

What is the possible true business value of such a filter?

What is the potential impact upon security to disclose the information
that this mail does?

What is the cost of deployment of this system against the costs
related to it's potential, and actual effects?

As novell say "cool" solutions. What a wonderful business term. 
I think I might use the word "cool" in my next board meeting.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: gwava-admin@....govt.nz <gwava-admin@....govt.nz>
Date: May 10, 2005 2:26 AM
Subject: GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)
To: undisclosed-recipients

A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for
Novell GroupWise.

The message was blocked for the following reason(s): 

Content filter 

The message contained the following information:

Subject:Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older
versions or something (maybe later too)
From:"jftucker@...il.com".INTERNET.IRDOM 
Recipient(s): [No To Addresses] 
[No Cc Addresses] 
JBM1.clhpo.IRDOM_Addresses 

 The following information details the events that prevented delivery
of this message:

 EventDetails 
 Content filtered

 Content within this message was disallowed.