lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed May 11 15:32:23 2005
From: kf_lists at digitalmunition.com (KF (lists))
Subject: BakBone NetVault last warning

They do mention "Progress continues toward making the required 
assessment under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the 
related rules"  but of course this has nothing to do with the security 
of their products. =]
-KF


class wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
> 
>have been also surprised to not see the word "security" in their open
>letter
>
>http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=67723&p=irol-newsArticle&t=Regular&id=704547&
>
>:>
>
>KF (lists) a ?crit :
>
>  
>
>>"when a man such as you reports a security hole we can not put all
>>works on the ground and say yes: we are fixing it"
>>
>>What kind of bullshit is that! I am glad I am not a customer of
>>theirs.
>>
>>What kind of man must you be to make them say "yes: we are fixing
>>it". Perhaps you have to be a sexy woman instead. =]
>>
>>-KF
>>
>>class wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>As a recall, there is now two months, the Hat-Squad has published 2
>>high security risks still UNPATCHED for BakBone NetVault 6.x/7.x
>>all versions. In an Open Letter:
>>
>>http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=67723&p=irol-newsArticle&t=Regular&id=704547&
>>
>>
>>
>>Bakbone announce a new NetVault Q4 2005, and a new MACOSX version.
>>My suggestion to BakBone is to review their whole code because Im
>>aware that another Heap overflow has been found by a friend without
>>to be published.
>>
>>We won't republish this warning as soon as BakBone choosed to wake
>>up, but we recommand to assest BakBone products if you are seeking
>>for security bugs, this is a nice peace of cheese.
>>
>>BakBone NetVault 6.x/7.x Remote Heap Buffer Overflow advisory
>>
>>class101.org/netv-remhbof.pdf
>>
>>BakBone NetVault 6.x/7.x Remote Heap Buffer Overflow exploit
>>
>>class101.org/36/55/op.php
>>
>>BakBone NetVault 6.x/7.x Local Stack Buffer Overflow advisory
>>
>>class101.org/netv-locsbof.pdf
>>
>>BakBone NetVault 6.x/7.x Local Stack Buffer Overflow exploit
>>
>>class101.org/36/55/op.php
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>      
>>>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>  
>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>>_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure -
>>We believe in it. Charter:
>>http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and
>>sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>    
>>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
> 
>iD8DBQFCghRrLyZ8K9aT7rARAgDuAJ4tYTFK7wN3XCYjveXSxJ2NHda3DACfQ4RL
>yFuS6o9Ch70AvcCR6Hwo8fs=
>=CfAp
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ