full-disclosure - KSpynix ::: the Unix version of KSpyware? (Proof Of Concept)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed May 11 02:52:32 2005
From: jftucker at gmail.com (James Tucker)
Subject: KSpynix ::: the Unix version of KSpyware?
	(Proof Of Concept)

Firefox was safe(r) for a time, now exposure has driven it to become a
viable and "timeworthy" market for the spyware and malware
communities. The same will come of operating systems and any other
highly pervasive applications.

On 5/10/05, me <me@...ek.ch> wrote:
> I totally agree with Barry. What a pathetic attempt... what for. Spyware
> and viri were one of the reason to switch to linux for me. I think it's
> kinda sad seeing people here wasting their time trying to code spyware
> for linux/unix. Get a life and do something constructive.
> 
> my2bits
> 
> me
> 
> bkfsec wrote:
> 
> > khaalel wrote:
> >
> >> I writed KSpynix because i didn't find an unix spyware, do you have
> >> one?
> >
> >
> >
> > I wonder, though, is this an ethical act?
> >
> > Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with Proof of Concept code --
> > however, there's a difference between writing a POC for a buffer
> > overflow and writing a trojan horse or a worm.  I think that most
> > people would class a spyware application as being malware outright,
> > not a POC.
> > Regarding a spyware POC: I don't think that one's really necessary.
> > Only an idiot would question whether or not files that the user has
> > write access to can be modified by running code.  The answer is pretty
> > obvious.
> >
> > So I really don't see a legitimate use for this package except for
> > hijacking portions of a user's system.
> >
> > I don't begrudge you the right to do what you wish, but I question the
> > validity of an ethical argument for this package.
> >
> >                   -Barry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>