[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505131539220.8697@high-mountain.nihongo.org>
Date: Fri May 13 23:50:05 2005
From: snowhare at nihongo.org (Benjamin Franz)
Subject: Benign Worms
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Eric Paynter wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2005 9:59 am, Michael Holstein said:
>>> 3. If not, what prevents you from doing that?
>> Any worm/virus, regardless of intent, is still illegal -- and I don't
>> think I can get a DSL line in jail.
>
> Not true. Intent is *everything* as far a criminal activity is concerned.
Don't quit your day job to work as a lawyer. There are a many laws that
turn on facts rather than intent.
"Lack of criminal intent does not shield a citizen from the BATF. In
United States v. Thomas, the defendant found a 16- inch-long gun while
horseback riding. Taking it to be an antique pistol, he pawned it. But it
turned out to be short-barreled rifle, which should have been registered
before selling. Although the prosecutor conceded that Thomas lacked
criminal intent, he was convicted of a felony anyway.[64] The Supreme
Court's decision in United States v. Freed declared that criminal intent
was not necessary for a conviction of violation of the Gun Control Act of
1968.[65]"
David Kopel, in "Trust The People: The Case Against Gun Control"
Note: This is not intended to bring gun control into the argument, it was
simply the first clear example I found of a conviction for a crime without
intent.
--
Benjamin Franz
Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.
- Alan Kay
Powered by blists - more mailing lists