[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20050515131324.280EB839@lists.grok.org.uk>
Date: Sun May 15 14:13:30 2005
From: randallm at fidmail.com (Randall M)
Subject: RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean)= Mutated
:-----Original Message-----
:From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
:[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf
:Of Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
:Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 7:41 PM
:To: nick@...us-l.demon.co.uk
:Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
:Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean)
:
:On Sun, 15 May 2005 12:20:25 +1200, Nick FitzGerald said:
:> Stejerean, Cosmin wrote:
:>
:> > I think you are going a little overboard with this kind of
:response.
:> > The guy
:>
:> Nope.
:>
:> The guy is clearly a chopper.
:
:A perfect proof of why benign worms are a Bad Idea. I've
:attached the Subject:
:lines from the original thread, and the current sub-thread:
:
:Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Benign Worms
:Subject: [Full-disclosure] RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean)
:
:If the *subject* line has sprouted a mutation from 'Benign' to
:'Bening', why should we trust the *entire worm* not to mutate? ;)
:
:(And no - I do *NOT* want to hear "but I typed that one in by
:hand" as an excuse or rationalization. The Subject: had a
:mutation. And that's all that's important.)
:
:
Good point Valdis. A perfect proof that mutation can only produce useless
information. The only hope for this thread would be the injection and help
of intelligent design otherwise it will not survive.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists