full-disclosure - RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun May 15 01:41:08 2005
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean) 

On Sun, 15 May 2005 12:20:25 +1200, Nick FitzGerald said:
> Stejerean, Cosmin wrote:
> 
> > I think you are going a little overboard with this kind of response. The guy
> 
> Nope.
> 
> The guy is clearly a chopper.

A perfect proof of why benign worms are a Bad Idea. I've attached the Subject:
lines from the original thread, and the current sub-thread:

Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Benign Worms
Subject: [Full-disclosure] RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean)

If the *subject* line has sprouted a mutation from 'Benign' to 'Bening',
why should we trust the *entire worm* not to mutate? ;)

(And no - I do *NOT* want to hear "but I typed that one in by hand" as
an excuse or rationalization. The Subject: had a mutation. And that's all
that's important.)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050514/b673fd09/attachment.bin