full-disclosure - Microsoft Windows and *nix Telnet Port NumberArgument Obfuscation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7b8067a40506080316511952a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed Jun  8 11:17:05 2005
From: raghu.chinthoju at gmail.com (Raghu Chinthoju)
Subject: Microsoft Windows and *nix Telnet Port
	NumberArgument Obfuscation

The list charter says "Any information pertaining to vulnerabilities
is acceptable". So, technically, the original post by Kristian is not
fit to be posted to FD :)

Jokes apart, Nick seems to be a bit hard humours guy!  Even though the
Charter says "Humour is acceptable provided it is inoffensive", this
kind of humor is quite usual to FD and acceptable to old timers on
this list, I guess. So, next time when some one has to post a
vulnerability they *just* found, may be they would look around to see
if they are the first ones.

And for asking questions or learning basics, may be security-basics
and others are more appropriate than FD.

Raghu


On 6/8/05, Arjan van der Velde <dj_noresult@...all.nl> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I like reading posts in here to learn from. It would be good not to be too
> hostile against people asking questions you already know the answer for or
> even have known it for ages already. If I were to ask a question I would
> like to be educated or at least pointed in the right direction. Some replies
> really discourage people from asking.
> 
> - Arjan
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Andrew
> Haninger
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 9:08
> To: nick@...us-l.demon.co.uk
> Cc: Full Disclosure
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft Windows and *nix Telnet Port
> NumberArgument Obfuscation
> 
> On 6/7/05, Nick FitzGerald <nick@...us-l.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > This has been known since Adam was a cowboy.
> Well, this /is/ full-disclosure, no? Best to tell than to withhold.
> 
> And while I would hope that there aren't a rash of old-school
> vulnerabilities blowing through the list, I, for one, was unaware that you
> could specify telnet ports like that. I wouldn't be surprised if I'm not
> alone. Now I'll know what's up if I ever see stuff like this.
> 
> Though it does worry me a bit that this came from a @cisco.com address.
> Shouldn't they be kind of *YAWN* about all things networking?
> 
> --
> Andy
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>