| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200506292041.j5TKf9vK030642@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Date: Wed Jun 29 21:41:19 2005 From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Jack Szeszycki On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:00:29 -1000, Jason Coombs said: > Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 04:00:40 +0930, Jack_Szeszycki@...count.com.au said: > >>I will respond to your email when I return. > > If, of course, the e-mail is still there when Jack returns. ;) > > Does this form a binding contract? At least his didn't include a "this is privileged info and you may not distribute it further" clause that tries to form a binding contract. I wish it had, I'd love to chase after them to invoice them for the costs of taking down our mailserver to make sure the message is *really* gone. Oh, and we'd have to do up new backup tapes. LTO-2s are *expensive*, and when you're doing several million messages a day, you go through a lot of them. Especially fun on a Monday, when we may need to clean up 3 day's worth of tapes... ;) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050629/789542e4/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists