full-disclosure - Re: Tools accepted by the courts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <77BAB4B54472AE94A7661A8C@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
Date: Tue Jul  5 15:44:46 2005
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Paul Schmehl)
Subject: Re: Tools accepted by the courts

--On Tuesday, July 05, 2005 02:04:20 -1000 Jason Coombs 
<jasonc@...ence.org> wrote:
>
> What I demand to hear spoken by law enforcement, and what I insist
> prosecutors compel law enforcement to speak if they don't volunteer these
> words out of their own common sense, is the following:
>
> "Yes, that's what we found on the hard drive but there's little or no
> reason for us to believe that the defendant is responsible for placing it
> there just because the hard drive was in the defendant's possession. We
> often see cases where hard drives are installed second-hand and data from
> previous owners remains on the drive, we can't tell when the data in
> question was written so it's important to be aware that hundreds of other
> people could have placed it there. We also see cases where software such
> as spyware or Web pages full of javascript force a suspect's Web browser
> to take actions that result in the appearance that the owner of the
> computer caused Internet content to be retrieved when in fact the owner
> of the computer may not have known what was happening, malicious Web site
> programmers know how to use techniques such as pop-unders and frames to
> hide scripted behavior of Web pages. Furthermore, once the Web browser is
> closed and its temporary files are deleted, every bit of data that was
> saved 'temporarily' to a file by the browser becomes a semi-permanent
> part of the hard drive's unallocated space and we have no way to tell the
> difference between data that was once part of a temporary file created
> automatically by a Web page being viewed or scripted inside a Web browser
> and the same data placed intentionally on the hard drive by its owner
> without the use of the Internet. Also ..."
>
Then you obviously don't understand the adversarial nature of our justice 
system.  It's the job of the *defense* attorney to discredit the evidence 
presented by a witness for the prosecution.  It is *not* the job of the 
prosecution to torpedo its own case.

Even in an ideal world where no prosecutor is ever over zealous, this would 
be brain-dead stupid.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/