lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <s2d4e1a4.005@mail.smuht.nwest.nhs.uk> Date: Wed Jul 13 09:41:01 2005 From: Marek.Isalski at smuht.nwest.nhs.uk (Marek Isalski) Subject: how to bypass rogue machine detection techniques > If you just implement > 802.1x or as you first mentioned, some kind of port scanning, then > you would never be able to detect a person with a =93receive=94 only > cable connected to you switch. Surely this isn't a problem on a switched network (unless your broadcast traffic is sensitive)? There might be a few packets of interest that you do see, but only while the switches learn MAC addresses. Marek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists