[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42DABB09.5040607@sec-consult.com>
Date: Sun Jul 17 21:02:22 2005
From: research at sec-consult.com (Bernhard Mueller)
Subject: Compromising pictures of Microsoft Internet
Explorer!
> Mr. Zalewski's statement about the undue burden that Microsoft's
> investigative processes place on the researcher is indeed accurate. The
> only time I've had any success working with Microsoft was when the issue
> was a straightforward code execution scenario. Oh wait... even then,
> I'm blown off.
the same here... when I mailed them about that COM-vulnerability in IE,
they came up with "this is not exploitable, bla.." after two weeks of
internal research
and all. having a bad morning anyway, I decided to post the advisory and
see, one day later there's a MS security advisory that "a COM object may
crash internet explorer" (however, they forgot to mention the public
bindshell exploit released by the fsirt).
now recently MS05-37 came out, which somehow doesn't include any credits
or mention of the original advisory whatsoever (the reason for that
being, i presume, the lack of responsibility showed by us).
I think it's rather strange to hear a billion-dollar software monopolist
apply to my conscience like "look what you've done, you put our
customers at risk". they wouldn't give a lame cent on the security of
their customers if there wasn't a certain media hype about security.
they care for their image and stock index, and that's about it. and i
don't see why should be held responsible for that ;)
regards,
sk0L
--
_____________________________________________________
~ DI (FH) Bernhard Mueller
~ IT Security Consultant
~ SEC-Consult Unternehmensberatung GmbH
~ www.sec-consult.com
~ A-1080 Wien Blindengasse 3
~ Tel: +43/676/840301718
~ Fax: +43/(0)1/4090307-590
______________________________________________________
Powered by blists - more mailing lists