full-disclosure - RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <37689.198.162.158.16.1121706388.squirrel@65.61.200.197>
Date: Mon Jul 18 18:07:46 2005
From: eric at arcticbears.com (Eric Paynter)
Subject: RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do 
	everything

On Mon, July 18, 2005 8:55 am, aaron_kempf@...mail.com said:
> I just don't mean for VULNS.   I mean for BUGS.
> Like when you import stuff from Access.. You try to import a spreadsheet
> AND IT DOESN'T FRIGGIN WORK.

Of course, you have the option to use another product. MS may be the most
dominant player, but they aren't the only player. They would improve
quickly if people (including large corporations) started forcing them to
improve by choosing alternatives. Unfortunately, most people don't care
about the little bugs.

I think this is getting a little OT since it's no longer about security
problems.

-Eric

--
arctic bears - email and dns services
http://www.arcticbears.com