lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <37689.198.162.158.16.1121706388.squirrel@65.61.200.197> Date: Mon Jul 18 18:07:46 2005 From: eric at arcticbears.com (Eric Paynter) Subject: RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything On Mon, July 18, 2005 8:55 am, aaron_kempf@...mail.com said: > I just don't mean for VULNS. I mean for BUGS. > Like when you import stuff from Access.. You try to import a spreadsheet > AND IT DOESN'T FRIGGIN WORK. Of course, you have the option to use another product. MS may be the most dominant player, but they aren't the only player. They would improve quickly if people (including large corporations) started forcing them to improve by choosing alternatives. Unfortunately, most people don't care about the little bugs. I think this is getting a little OT since it's no longer about security problems. -Eric -- arctic bears - email and dns services http://www.arcticbears.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists