lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <42E7C10D.3060703@science.org> Date: Wed Jul 27 18:14:10 2005 From: jasonc at science.org (Jason Coombs) Subject: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired Adam Jones wrote: > What exactly is wrong with this? I personally would rather have 3com > buying up exploits (probably under an agreement for exclusive access) > instead of having them sold to the highest, probably malicious, > bidder. Even if someone sells it to both there is a more reputable > group that has the exploit and can help with mitigation. > > - Adam > On 7/26/05, J.A. Terranson <measl@....org> wrote: > >>Yet another voice baying at the moon. Come on, Adam. Do you still not understand that the entirety of almost all 'security' fixes is a change to a single character on a single line of a single file of source code? How much more complicated do you need to make it in order to feel safe? 3Com needs it to be so complicated that a 'Digital Vaccine' is required in order to make you feel healthy again. Bull. Crap. Lies. Regards, Jason Coombs jasonc@...ence.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists