[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200507292206.j6TM6FiU003870@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri Jul 29 23:06:30 2005
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:17:48 +0200, Jochen Kaiser said:
> maybe I am wrong, but with high end switchrouter I thought that routing
> protocols are handled by IOS by the cpu - after calculated, the topology
> is programmed in e.g. TCAM memory.
That's the *point* - the CPU is what's vulnerable here. A suggestion was made to
replace the CPU with an ASIC or FPGA. I pointed out that if you did that, then
the ASIC would have to do BGP4, because otherwise there'd not be a routing table
loaded in the TCAM memory for the line cards to use....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050729/9d4b6fb7/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists