[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42EADF00.2040603@science.org>
Date: Sat Jul 30 02:58:55 2005
From: jasonc at science.org (Jason Coombs)
Subject: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco
Security Presentation
J.A. Terranson wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Jason Coombs wrote:
>>reverse engineered.
>
> *millions* of copies of these "secrets" in general circulation. Nobody
> can assert with a straight face that anything about Lynn's presentation is
> not completely and totally within the public view - and irretrievably so.
Just because you have a copy doesn't mean the document is in public
view. The infowarrior.org URL no longer provides a copy of the trade
secrets to those who seek them, so the effort to control distribution is
working. Anyone who complies with the court order will delete their copy
of the document and forget what they have read.
You are making an argument that the legal system doesn't work just
because you can disregard it at your own peril. That's nonsensical.
Regards,
Jason Coombs
jasonc@...ence.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists