[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1122682069.32564.78.camel@localhost>
Date: Sat Jul 30 01:07:59 2005
From: frank at knobbe.us (Frank Knobbe)
Subject: Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 18:57 -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> They fucked up. They'll have to fix it then. But thats not the same
as
> the gross negligence they're being accused of.
I'm not sure that can fix that. Unless they add canaries to the stack
and include other OpenBSD style W^X type checks. I mean, it's the same
problem any OS that uses stacks faces. It's just that we now begin to
see how things are laid out in IOS and gain information about its
routines, how it works, and how to bypass watchdogs and such.
Cisco just has to be more careful with vulnerabilities now since they
can be exploited better :)
Cheers,
Frank
--
Shame on Cisco. Double-Shame on ISS.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050729/24b1f7be/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists