full-disclosure - RE: Getting a clue at Cisco

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon Aug  1 20:52:24 2005
From: wintrmte at gmail.com (Sam Evans)
Subject: RE: Getting a clue at Cisco

Just curious -- if the April patch fixed the vulnerability discussed, then 
that would mean (according to Cisco) that the vulnerability affected IPV6 
and not IPV4, correct?
 

 On 8/1/05, byte_jump <bytejump@...il.com> wrote: 
> 
> In my opinion, probably the grossest error made by Cisco in all of
> this was silently patching their IOS back in April. Anyone who's ever
> used Cisco's software knows that you can never run the latest release,
> unless you want things to break, and break badly. As a result, how
> many organizations were at the latest, patched IOS release as of
> BlackHat? Not many, I'd wager. If, however, Cisco had come clean and
> told everyone that there is a serious problem in their IOS and
> exploitation is being actively researched by Chinese hacker groups,
> you'd see a lot more uptake of that April IOS release. Instead, Cisco
> hangs their customers out to dry.
> 
> Shameful, just shameful.
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050801/40aa7ee1/attachment.html