[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42F52048.7000401@key2it.com.au>
Date: Sat Aug 6 07:40:58 2005
From: lyal.collins at key2it.com.au (root)
Subject: Defeating Citi-Bank Virtual Keyboard Protection
Aditya Deshmukh wrote:
>The only most secure protection is a one time password with a challenge /
>response scheme. Most of the banks in europe already do this.
>
>They give out a calculator like device to the customers and when u want to
>login you are presented with a challenge that you punch into you device
>which spits a response that you enter that into the form....
>
>Costly for the bank but very effective security for the customer and bank in
>terms of gain in security and decrease in losses due to fraud ....
>
>
>- Aditya
>
>
>
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>
>
Respectfully, I disagree.
Although I never attended, this year's IT Underground conference in
poland promised a hand on session breaking OTP tokens. As Schneier
says, OT token device merely force a tactical shift by the attacker, not
a permanent fix.
The credit card industry's 'fixes' have only been effective for weeks to
months over the past decade, so I don't consider OTPs will make much
difference relative to the cost in the mid-long term.
Lyal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists