full-disclosure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <42F915EE.16846.883CF244@localhost>
Date: Tue Aug  9 09:45:54 2005
From: nick at virus-l.demon.co.uk (Nick FitzGerald)
Subject: Plaxo?

Aditya Deshmukh wrote:

> I need some advice about allowing plaxo running on my internal network.
> 
> Shoud I allow it or ban it ?

Default deny.

If you need to ask, there is clearly _no_ need to ask...

And a hint to clueful thinking about all such services -- how can you 
(or your users) assure the confidentiality of your/their address books 
if they are being stored and managed offsite?

That is not to say that such is not possible -- depending on the 
standards you wish or need to maintain -- but do any of these quasi-
anonymous web-based address book managers even start to take the kinds 
of steps necessary to assure you to the level you require?  And, how 
can you be sure that they actually do meet those requirements?  Is 
their "terms of service" document really a sufficient basis on which to 
form such a relationship?

Regards,

Nick FitzGerald