full-disclosure - New T&C poll: Was Lynn right?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20050809105415.GB18997@blaatann.urgusabic.net>
Date: Tue Aug  9 11:54:30 2005
From: nick at urgusabic.net (Nick Murison)
Subject: New T&C poll: Was Lynn right?

(Yes, this is a shameless plug)

Good morning everyone,

Seen as the storm after BlackHat has settled a little, I thought it'd be nice
to see what people had decided about Michael Lynn's presentation.  Was he
right to go ahead with it, or was it really not his call?

Judging from the security mailing lists, everyone and their dog has now had
the opportunity to ramble on about the finer details of the situation.  At
www.ThreatsAndCountermeasures.com, we just want some straight answers, so we
made it the topic of our latest poll :)

So go along to https://www.threatsandcountermeasures.com and submit your
vote:

Was Lynn right to hold his BlackHat talk?
a) Yes, information should be free
b) Yes, to safeguard infrastructure
c) No, to safeguard infrastructure
d) No, he violated IP
e) Don't care

Best regards,
Nick Murison (editor in chief)
https://www.threatsandcountermeasures.com