[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAoCvNsEMfE0ClpoD8BfPb3iKFAAAQAAAAfAOFFRyqTUiTf60L4hVVAQEAAAAA@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Aug 9 02:34:33 2005
From: charles.heselton at gmail.com (Charles Heselton)
Subject: perfect security architecture (network)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Although Daniel's comments may be tongue-in-cheek, there is some
truth. Here are a few ideas that have become more or less mantras
for me, personally....
There IS NO *perfect* security.
Defense in depth.
The larger your network is, the less effective your perimeter
becomes.
The end user is always the weakest link.
There may be a few more that people feel I have left out. Basically,
if you're asking what I think you're asking, you have to be able to
cater the level of security you're providing to the needs of your
customer. Anti-virus/spyware software, firewalls, IDS/IPSs,
"Security Minded" routing......all of these thing have a part in an
ideally secure situation. The point is to identify the most critical
assets and possible vectors of attack. Then you design a security
architecture that 1) addresses those vectors, and 2) has multiple
layers that should one preventative method fail, another will
detect/prevent (defense in depth). There will always be someone out
there who is able to figure out a hole, with enough knowledge,
experience, persistence, and luck.
If you have a customer that is asking for "perfect security", tell
them it can't be done. If you're asking a philosophical question,
well secure application development can make a security
professional's life a little easier, but it's not going to solve the
fundamental problem. But, just like the rest of the security tools
(firewalls, etc.), more secure applications and programming
techniques only play a part.
HTH.
- --
- - Charlie
5A27 58D2 C791 8769 D4A4 F316 7BF8 D1F6 4829 EDCF
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf
> Of Daniel H. Renner
> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 9:08 AM
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] perfect security architecture
> (network)
>
> Good Lord C0br4,
>
> Did your new client give you a shopping list or what?
>
> Use the force C0br4! The force (of the right forum) will protect
> you!
>
> --
> Dan Renner
> Los Angeles Computerhelp
> http://losangelescomputerhelp.com
>
>
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 12:00 +0100,
> full-disclosure-request@...ts.grok.org.uk wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:04:34 +0530
> > From: C0BR4 <cobradead@...il.com>
> > Subject: [Full-disclosure] perfect security architecture
> > (network) To: websecurity@...appsec.org
> > Message-ID: <457462ba0508072234bc6216c@...l.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Have couple of questions need answers plz...........
> >
> > There are three attacks that jeopardize Information security.
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > - secure Network -
> > ------------------------------
> > - secure Host -
> > ------------------------------
> > - secure Application -
> > -------------------------------
> >
> > How can we optimize security? Stopping attacks at network
> or building
> > secure applications..
> >
> > How should we deal with these attacks? People talk about
> > Firewall, IDS/IPS etc..
> >
> > What's best?
> >
> > If asked to give a perfect security architecture (network)
> what would
> > you suggest? Given
> > a Firewall, Router, IDS, IPS and Anti-virus .
> >
> > thank you
> > C0br4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1
iQA/AwUBQvgImHv40fZIKe3PEQIKUACg3rcR67ioI8s3UK2Lm8U1Tr+ytvQAoIu6
47spbOk+qXkqN09ep0nR9Dms
=7fIa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists