lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri Aug 12 04:27:29 2005
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Re: Help put a stop to incompetent
	computerforensics 

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:39:37 -0000, Jason Coombs said:

> Who roasts who at trial? It depends on the evidence

If it just depended on the evidence, we wouldn't need expert witnesses, would we?

If the opposing expert witnesses were auto mechanics, and one doesn't
know that every other mechanic in town calls a given part a head gasket,
which one is going to be more believable?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050811/d8b6ba45/attachment.bin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists