full-disclosure - Re: Help put a stop to incompetent computerforensics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200508120327.j7C3RIxO014605@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri Aug 12 04:27:29 2005
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Re: Help put a stop to incompetent
	computerforensics 

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:39:37 -0000, Jason Coombs said:

> Who roasts who at trial? It depends on the evidence

If it just depended on the evidence, we wouldn't need expert witnesses, would we?

If the opposing expert witnesses were auto mechanics, and one doesn't
know that every other mechanic in town calls a given part a head gasket,
which one is going to be more believable?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050811/d8b6ba45/attachment.bin