lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri Aug 12 04:27:29 2005 From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Re: Help put a stop to incompetent computerforensics On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:39:37 -0000, Jason Coombs said: > Who roasts who at trial? It depends on the evidence If it just depended on the evidence, we wouldn't need expert witnesses, would we? If the opposing expert witnesses were auto mechanics, and one doesn't know that every other mechanic in town calls a given part a head gasket, which one is going to be more believable? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050811/d8b6ba45/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists