full-disclosure - bash vulnerability?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0508131021000.15698-100000@pegasus.teamwerk.com>
Date: Sat Aug 13 16:58:10 2005
From: andre.breiler at null-mx.org (Andre' Breiler)
Subject: bash vulnerability?

Hi,

On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Matija Vidmar wrote:

>
>
> Wernfried Haas wrote:
>
> > assuming you actually meant
> > :(){ :|:& };: (which can be harmful if no limits are set)?

The ':()' defines a fuction ':' with a fuction body of
{
 : | : &
}

As you can see this is a recursive call as the fuction ':' is called,
it's output passed via a pipe as input to the fuction ':' and this
whole command is run in the background '&' .

The last ':' in the string (after the ';') calls the fuction and therefore
starts it all of.

> What does it do?

It's a very simple fork bomb as other have said allready.
It's known for some time and usually handed to new starters as a joke.

Andre'