lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed Aug 17 17:03:48 2005 From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Re: pnp worm unknown variant - post infectionactions On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:16:04 CDT, "Madison, Marc" said: > lab has compiled hashes of know child porn, they use the hashes to > perform quick scans of suspected criminals computers in order to > facilitate a quicker response to the investigating agency in the case. OK.. So we found the hash, therefor the guy is guilty.. > And if I'm not mistaken Metasploit with out any changes is extremely > noisy which makes it easy to identify as Metasploit. And if we're facilitating a "quicker response", how do we reconcile that with taking the time to identify a Metasploit that *has* been changed to be less noisy? "We found the hash, we didn't see any signs of a stock noisy Metasploit, and it would have taken too long to look for a modified Metasploit version we've never seen before, so the guy is guilty..." I think that's *exactly* the situation that Jason is complaining about... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050817/32ec039b/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists