[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4305DF56.3000604@csuohio.edu>
Date: Fri Aug 19 14:32:28 2005
From: michael.holstein at csuohio.edu (Michael Holstein)
Subject: morphed into certification argument (was : MS not
telling enough - ethics)
> They do random credential checking and I should I know, since I was
> audited after I passed the exam.
Me too .. before they'd issue my cert, I had to provide a resume, and
they verified my employment history (yes, they did call).
> The CISSP cert is the best security cert around, without a doubt.
Personally I learned more from my SANS training (not the classes, just
taking the 'challenge' exams) .. because they actually make you write a
(rather long) paper based on your own original research.
The CISSP material was good (didn't go to those classes either .. just
read the books) because without I'd have never known what heights of
fence are required for various levels of security at a physical site --
the CISSP credential is good because it makes you focus on other areas
of the practice you might not have considered (site security, for
example -- as in the previous example).
Does a [favorite lettered credential] cert *prove* you know anything? Of
course not. But it's just one more set of initials you can tack after
your name -- which helps immensely when you're trying to best out the
other 100 applicants for a job, or going back-and-forth with the
defense's lawyer about "are you qualified to present this testimony".
My $0.02.
Michael Holstein CISSP GCIA
Cleveland State University
Powered by blists - more mailing lists