full-disclosure - talk.google.com

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <da15e23f05082710065f47cf00@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat Aug 27 18:06:42 2005
From: wesleymcgrew at gmail.com (Robert Wesley McGrew)
Subject: talk.google.com

On 8/27/05, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote:
> Yahoo's current IM application, highly bloated with features more
> geared up for a Yahooligans IM client. Yahooligans, The web for kids.
> www.yahooligans.com
> 
> Yahoo plan to strip their current Yahoo Messenger 7.0 for a new lite
> version, to stop half of Yahoo's 20 million IM users from switching to
> Google Talk, when Yahoo finally pull the switch on Yahoo's older,
> lighter version of Yahoo Messenger.
<snip>
> Yahoo Messenger 8.0 LITE is the future of IM...
> 
> http://www.geocities.com/n3td3v/ymessenger80lite.html

Is it just me, or are you getting more incoherent with every post? 
It's like you can't decide if you want to make a hacked-up YM client
(ala Kazaa Lite), a fake yahoo press release with witty commentary, an
open letter to yahoo, or something else entirely.  Maybe I missed it,
but I don't even think anyone mentioned yahoo up to this point in a
way that would provoke this.

I guess I just don't get it.  

-- 
Robert Wesley McGrew
http://cse.msstate.edu/~rwm8/