full-disclosure - Re: The Wireless Networking Excuse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5aad114b05082919337a63fea5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue Aug 30 03:33:13 2005
From: womber at gmail.com (womber)
Subject: Re: The Wireless Networking Excuse

On 8/29/05, yahoo123456@...hmail.com <yahoo123456@...hmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone examined the idea of using a public hotspot on a local 
> network to shield BSA, RIAA, MPAA lawsuits? Since the tracking 
> stops at the public facing IP, who is to say it wasn't some 
> freeloader downloading the warez? 
> 
> Just looking for some feedback on this one...

It is an interesting point. I have thought about it myself in the
context of having my personal access point open to the public and if
someone hopped on and downloaded something.
Would I be resposible if they tracked it back to my AP?
I am not a legal expert by any means but I would think it would be
comparable to someone using my phone to make a harasing call.
Although I am not sure how that would be ruled either.